TN: two for dinner

Post Reply
User avatar
Harry C.
Posts: 540
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:00 am
Contact:

TN: two for dinner

Post by Harry C. »

  • 2006 Aubert Chardonnay Ritchie Vineyard - USA, California, Sonoma County, Sonoma Coast (7/16/2011)
    Pale gold/yellow. Nose was more oaky than usual, vanilla and lemon juice. Taste was a bright acidity, lemon and grapefruit with a creaminess. I am still not convinced about 2006 Aubert. (90 pts.)
  • 2003 Clos des Papes Châteauneuf-du-Pape - France, Rhône, Southern Rhône, Châteauneuf-du-Pape (7/16/2011)
    Deep garnet. Nose was slightly stewed in impression, reminds one of Amarone, overripe. Taste was similar. I wonder if this was heat damaged versus a style I don't care for in this super hot vintage. Gotten from Premier Cru and kept in active temp control since. 85? (85 pts.)
Posted from CellarTracker
User avatar
sdr
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:20 pm
Contact:

Re: TN: two for dinner

Post by sdr »

I used to like Aubert chards more than I do now. Maybe it was the cloudy green color than captivated me. Now I find them tasty, but too simple for the tariff.

Stuart
User avatar
Harry C.
Posts: 540
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 1:00 am
Contact:

Re: TN: two for dinner

Post by Harry C. »

Stu-I don't find Aubert 'simple'. But give me examples of Chards up your alley. (New World please.)
User avatar
Claret
Posts: 1143
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:16 pm
Location: Reno, NV
Contact:

Re: TN: two for dinner

Post by Claret »

2004 Montelena Chard last night was outstanding. Non malo, little oak and deep. A unique Napa Chard that ages well.
Glenn
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 148 guests