We didn’t know either the order of wines served in each flight. Some great bottles showed up confirming indeed their splendid provenance. I simply don’t understand how several well-established wine-critics rate Pichon Comtesse, Mouton Rothschild and Montrose from 1970 that low in their articles? Lower 80s?? It seemed to me that our bottles on the day were just perfect!.
We absolutely didn’t complain about wines served that cold Friday evening in February 2020. It was just an awesome experience!
Flight 1.
1. Fine distinctive nose, truffles, refined, elegant on the nose, fine balance, smooth aftertaste. It turned out to be Giscours 1983. Margaux commune was very strong in this vintage, but communes further north weren’t. 91p.
2. Similar in style and elegance to the wine before with more acidity. Really well-made wine. It was older vintage from same chateau, 1975. 91p.
Flight 2.
1. Fine nose of red fruit, nice complexity and structure, smooth finish, peaked a decade or two ago. 88p. Leoville Las Cases 1970.
2. Big, complex and intense nose of dark cherries, big with truffles on the palate, long and sophisticated. Impressive stuff for a 50 years old wine which easily can thrill wine freaks for another 10-15 years! Best wine of the evening – Pichon Comtesse 1970! 96p.
Flight 3.
1. Intense on the nose, dark and dense, color of this wine indicated a wine not that old. Delicate and complete wine with delicious cherry fruit on the palate and with smooth and fruity finish. Guess what – it turned out to be Latour-á-Pomerol 1970! 93p.
2. Old and tired wine, little fruit left, not exciting, probably not a bottle kept under pristine condition. La Mission Haut Brion 1970. Not rated.
Flight 4.
1. Potent wine with some leek and green leaves flavors, indicating a big content of Cabernet Franc in it. Great complexity and great balance, typical Right Bank wine, sophisticated, rich and with great elegance. Impressive stuff. Cheval Blanc 1975 has arrived here! 52% Cabernet Franc here. Low yield in this vintage, only 21.5 hl/ha. 94p.
2. Similar in appearance as first served wine, very much Cabernet wine, indicating neighbor property to 1. We quickly found out that two wines in this flight were Cheval Blanc (1) and Figeac (2)! Figeac has 66% Cabernet with half Franc and half Sauvignon. Remaining 34% is Merlot. Impressive length, complexity and structure. Sophisticated stuff. Figeac 1975 in full bloom. 94p.
Flight 5.
1. Finely structured wine with splendid complexity, fine structure, well-balanced and with long finish. Very enjoyable. It turned out to be Cheval Blanc 1970. Not one of the very best wines from this property but it certainly has style. 91p.
2. Nice ripe nose, nicely put together, polished fruit, tasty, fine smooth finish. Well-preserved and drinkable wine. It was Ausone 1970 in the glass. 90p.
Flight 6.
1. Powerful and strong, complete, complex, refined and sophisticated, long fine finish. Sublime quality here. Many years to go! We all smiled, hearing that we had Mouton Rothschild 1970 in the glass. 94p.
2. Juicy and succulent wine, quite nice on the palate, tasted significantly simpler than first served with less complexity and weaker structure. Very enjoyable wine of nice quality. It was a “ringer” (dark horse), magnum of Pedesclaux 1970. 90p.
Flight 7.
1. Powerful, complex, fine structure and length, strong backbone, still going strong with no sign of fading away, super complexity and length. A great example of classic Bordeaux stuff. We had Montrose 1970 in our glasses. 94p.
2. This wine tasted well-aged, still alive though, tasty fruit, fine balance and length, some elegance. Nice. Again, it was a magnum from 1970 vintage, this time Marquis d’Alesme Becker. 90p.
Flight 8.
1. Strong and intense nose of raspberries, powerful on the palate, yet with great finesse and elegance, great complexity and depth. Really ringing the bell. Another vintage of Cheval Blanc to treat us, this time 1983. 95p.
2. Similar appearance to the wine before and a delightful wine to enjoy. Cheval Blanc’s neighbor came to say hello, Figeac 1983! 94p.
Flight 9.
1. Dark color, powerful, deep, excellently composed, strong backbone, fine complexity and length. Fine ripe fruit and tannin, no dryness. Do I find excess of alcohol here – no! It’s well-integrated. The wine? Giscours 2009! Great showing indeed. 94p.
2. Totally undeveloped yet great fragrance and acidity. Far, far too young to taste right now. This wine has an unlimited potential. We said hello and see you later to Chateau Margaux 2014. 95+p.
Flight 10.
1. This wine looked younger in color and appearance than following wine. Guava, melon, pear, apricot and expressive acidity. Rich, elegant and with thrilling sweetness. Simply a delicacy. It was Filhot 1970! 93p.
2. Showed age and tasted a bit tired. It was Yquem 1970. Question of provenance may arise here, because this wine should taste better. Or has it always tasted like that? 90p.
![Uber Geek :ugeek:](./images/smilies/icon_e_ugeek.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
![Surprised :o](./images/smilies/icon_e_surprised.gif)