TN: 2013 Pierre Bouree Chambertin

Post Reply
User avatar
jal
Posts: 2931
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:30 pm
Contact:

TN: 2013 Pierre Bouree Chambertin

Post by jal »

In a nutshell: meh.
I bought this at Acker last month for $100, actually they still have 4 bottles and I only opened this to see if I wanted to buy the other 4. It is ok, nice nose and pretty color but it is more of a decent 1er Cru quality than a Grand Cru. It is very acidic but that is tempered by having it with food, it has a nice core of fruit but the structure is weak and the finish is short. I've had much better wines for the price. Gilman for some reason gave this 95 iirc, I think it's more of a 89-90 range. I won't buy more.
Best

Jacques
User avatar
stefan
Posts: 6245
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: College Station, TX
Contact:

Re: TN: 2013 Pierre Bouree Chambertin

Post by stefan »

>>
I bought this at Acker last month
>>

So why do you assume that the bottle contained Chambertin?
User avatar
DavidG
Posts: 8293
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:12 pm
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Re: TN: 2013 Pierre Bouree Chambertin

Post by DavidG »

stefan wrote: Fri Dec 30, 2022 1:28 am >>
I bought this at Acker last month
>>

So why do you assume that the bottle contained Chambertin?
:lol:
User avatar
JimHow
Posts: 20223
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:49 pm
Location: Lewiston, Maine, United States
Contact:

Re: TN: 2013 Pierre Bouree Chambertin

Post by JimHow »

I don't get the joke.
User avatar
jal
Posts: 2931
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:30 pm
Contact:

Re: TN: 2013 Pierre Bouree Chambertin

Post by jal »

Oh I'm sure this wasn't a fake. It was a good wine but not a bargain or a 95 point wine.
Best

Jacques
User avatar
jal
Posts: 2931
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:30 pm
Contact:

Re: TN: 2013 Pierre Bouree Chambertin

Post by jal »

JimHow wrote: Fri Dec 30, 2022 2:24 am I don't get the joke.
Just go with
John Kapon
Rudy
Laurent Ponsot
Acker
Best

Jacques
User avatar
JimHow
Posts: 20223
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:49 pm
Location: Lewiston, Maine, United States
Contact:

Re: TN: 2013 Pierre Bouree Chambertin

Post by JimHow »

Ah ok now I get it.
User avatar
Blanquito
Posts: 5923
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: TN: 2013 Pierre Bouree Chambertin

Post by Blanquito »

Well, crap. I have 6 bottles of 2012 Pierre Bouree Charmes Chambertin, bought largely on the strength of Gilman’s 94+ pts.
User avatar
jal
Posts: 2931
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:30 pm
Contact:

Re: TN: 2013 Pierre Bouree Chambertin

Post by jal »

Blanquito wrote: Fri Dec 30, 2022 3:19 am Well, crap. I have 6 bottles of 2012 Pierre Bouree Charmes Chambertin, bought largely on the strength of Gilman’s 94+ pts.
It wasn't a bad wine, Patrick, actually it was enjoyable. I just expected more from such a terroir.
Best

Jacques
User avatar
Blanquito
Posts: 5923
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: TN: 2013 Pierre Bouree Chambertin

Post by Blanquito »

I’m gonna give mine another 5 years and then try one at age 15.
User avatar
marcs
Posts: 1863
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 2:51 am
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Re: TN: 2013 Pierre Bouree Chambertin

Post by marcs »

Looking at some of the posts on Wineberserkers, which has some guys who really really know Burgundy, they seem to be under the impression that outside of Rousseau Chambertin can be a little tricky. They also seemed to think that Chambertin Clos de Beze is more reliable
User avatar
stefan
Posts: 6245
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: College Station, TX
Contact:

Re: TN: 2013 Pierre Bouree Chambertin

Post by stefan »

>>
I’m gonna give mine another 5 years and then try one at age 15.
>>

Good plan, Patrick. I don't recall ever being impressed by a young Chambertin. But when Chambertin reaches full maturity, it is often fabulous.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google [Bot] and 38 guests