Page 1 of 1

Two 2000 crus bourgeois

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 5:54 am
by AlexR
Inaugurated our new dining room with a good, uncomplicated summer meal and some vino :-).

2005 Château Robin, Côtes de Castillon was rich and plummy, pretty primary and good (no oak showing and not much length).

2000 Château Beaumont, Haut-Médoc: This is drinking well now. It has nice tertiary blackcurrant characteristics, but seems a little thin. Still, a fine Médoc in a minor key.

2000 Château Lannessan, Haut Médoc: I've long liked this estate, an inexpensive old-fashioned wine. However, it let me down this time. Nondescript, lacklustre, boring. I doubt it'll improve further, but I have one more bottle and will give it another chance in 3 years or so.

The above confirms that many 2000 Bordeaux - other than the finest great growths, of course - are fine to drink now.
I look forward to reading about comparative tastings of the latter wines on the Internet because 2000 is kind of my swan song: the last fine vintage I have any quantity of, and I'm not getting any younger :-).
So, I'm very interested in knowing when they'll be ready to drink!

All the best,
Alex R.

Re: Two 2000 crus bourgeois

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 7:58 am
by AlexR
Interesting.
I see that 5 people have read my post by 5:30 am.

Considering that most BWEers are in America, that means they also tend to stay up very late... or get up very early!

Alex R.

Re: Two 2000 crus bourgeois

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 9:20 am
by AlexR
Sorry, forgot to add that 5:30 am was EST.

Alex

Re: Two 2000 crus bourgeois

Posted: Mon Aug 01, 2011 1:28 pm
by stefan
It is hard to believe that Lannessan did not make a good wine in 2000.

We drink Beaumont early and finished our case of 2000 three years ago. Now we are drinking our '05, which also is good.

Re: Two 2000 crus bourgeois

Posted: Fri May 14, 2021 5:54 pm
by AlexR
Hi,

I don't know if the dates on top of posts are accurate.
If they are, the last time I wrote up 2000 Lannessan was ten years ago (which doesn't seem right to me).
Anyway, we had a bottle of this wine at lunch and it showed better.
Certainly it was a little thin, and the aftertaste lacked power, but it was a classic Médoc you'd be hard put to dislike :-).
I have one more bottle, but there is really no reason to age this wine further.

Alex R.

Re: Two 2000 crus bourgeois

Posted: Fri May 14, 2021 8:03 pm
by AKR
Definitely should be drunk now

Re: Two 2000 crus bourgeois

Posted: Fri May 14, 2021 9:00 pm
by johnz
I purchased six bottles of 2000 Lanessan on release for $12/btl. All were very good and quite classic, but not profound -- just a good bordeaux at an excellent price. I drank them all up from 2012 - 2016, and agree that they won't get better and need drinking.

--Gary Rust

Re: Two 2000 crus bourgeois

Posted: Sat May 15, 2021 10:20 am
by OrlandoRobert
I seem to like this 2000 Lanessan more than you boys, and while it’s in an excellent drinking zone right now, I do not think it is going to fall off the cliff any time soon. A really classic cru bourgeois. Wish there were more wines likes this in the market. To me, for us daily wine drinkers, I think wines like this are as important - and arguably more important - than the blue chip Bordeaux that you drink on weekends or special evenings.

Re: Two 2000 crus bourgeois

Posted: Sat May 15, 2021 3:26 pm
by Rainer Guntermann
I really like Lanessan a lot and have drunk through 2 cases in the last years and ordered it often in our favourite restaurant in Hamburg due to its excellent QPR.
The 2000 is a very reliable wine and a bottle 4 weeks ago was mature, but as Orlando said far away from falling over the cliff. Dark fruited, medium bodied, melted tannins, and lots of wood and forest aromae. I really like these kind of cru Bourgeois which are often punching above their weight and mature Lannessan is a poster Child for this.Happy to have a few and some mags left. From our cellar a perfect Sunday roast wine.
Cheers
Rainer