Sociando Mallet 1996

Post Reply
User avatar
Comte Flaneur
Posts: 4887
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:05 pm
Contact:

Sociando Mallet 1996

Post by Comte Flaneur »

This bottle was very much alive but woody, peppery, dominated by green notes, and fruit shy. Medium bodied, does frankly not provide a lot of pleasure. Was this just a disappointing bottle, or is this wine going through a protracted awkward phase or is it just not what it is cracked up to be? Judgement reserved. Last bottle out of case one, two more to go.
User avatar
Comte Flaneur
Posts: 4887
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Sociando Mallet 1996

Post by Comte Flaneur »

After 2 1/2 hours it is definitely improving, and it has a good texture. But it is so green. This green and unpleasant wine.
User avatar
BordeauxKassett
Posts: 12
Joined: Wed Nov 17, 2010 3:52 pm
Location: Oslo, Norway
Contact:

Re: Sociando Mallet 1996

Post by BordeauxKassett »

Must have been an off bottle. Had this a year ago and the wine was really shining! No real herbalism present and the quality of the fruit was just so awesome. I suspected then that this wine should lay down until 2018 for optimum drinking pleasure, but I may of course be wrong about that...
User avatar
stefan
Posts: 6242
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: College Station, TX
Contact:

Re: Sociando Mallet 1996

Post by stefan »

My 96 SM are drinking very well now.
User avatar
jal
Posts: 2931
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:30 pm
Contact:

Re: Sociando Mallet 1996

Post by jal »

stefan wrote:My 96 SM are drinking very well now.
So are mine but the green pepper is noticeable. I guess I'm not as sensitive as you, Ian
Best

Jacques
User avatar
Comte Flaneur
Posts: 4887
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:05 pm
Contact:

Re: Sociando Mallet 1996

Post by Comte Flaneur »

Yes maybe it was faulty. Today we got a lot of brine, seashore and (dead) cuttle fish; the jolly green giant had disappeared. We don't think it was corked, but it certainly was not in tip top order.

I have drunk a lot of these, a case actually, and don't really get this wine. Sometimes it has been good, some times underwhelming and always seemingly young/backward.

In the BWE SM vertical we did in NYC in 2006 the 1996 it was amongst the also rans. The 1982, 1986' 1989, 1990, 2000 were better. So we're the the 1995 and 2003 frankly. But I remember on that occasion people commenting it was not in form.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 196 guests