Page 1 of 1

2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 9:18 pm
by JimHow
The wines have been uncorked....

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 9:33 pm
by JimHow
Mmmm this 2010 is 1996-like: Ripe but structured and balanced, good deep color, will age slowly and well, not in a 1986 kind of way, but in the character of that ripe, structured Cabernet year of 1996.

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 9:38 pm
by JimHow
Swirling the 2009 now. Initial observation is that the bouquet of the 2010 is just a bit more forthcoming, at least early on after popping and pouring.

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 9:50 pm
by JimHow
This 2009 is damned nice as well.
Not "structured." Smooth.
Both are Jim How kind of wines.
Cantemerle may just now be my favorite wine.
I just got a couple mags of the 2010 on sale at Zachys at $85 per bottle.
I'm definitely getting a case each of the 2009 and 2010.

I thin I've asked this question before: Shat other wines from that neighborhood are in the mld of Cantemerle, La Lagune, etc.?

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:00 pm
by JimHow
Mmmmm gonna have some whoopie tonight....

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:01 pm
by JimHow
You know you want some....

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Thu Mar 13, 2014 10:02 pm
by JimHow
David will correct me if I'm wrong but I think there are only 7 spaces left for the convention dinner!!

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 12:14 am
by JonB
I liked the 2010 at UGC, and bought a case. I was curious whether this would stay accessible.

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 12:21 am
by JimHow
Very good question Jon.
Both wines are 13% and not Parkerized, so that may help to keep prices down.
These wines are just really beautiful.
I am seriously thinking of buying TWO cases of each of the 2009 and 2010.
This property just really hits the sweet spot for me.

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 12:22 am
by JimHow
The 2009 goes for $39 at MacArthur's and the 2010 is $42 at PJs.

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 2:00 am
by JimHow
Loved both of these wines.
It is fascinating how they just performed to expectations in light of their respective vintages:
The 2009 was round, no hard edges, elegant, 13% in a 14.5% vintage. Margaux-like. Very balanced. Lovely. 93 points.
The 2010 was just a bit more rugged, structured, 1996-like, more perfume, some hard edges but in a good way, just a little more hair on the chest. I'll go with HWSRN's 94+.
Both of them were outstanding. Great "mouth-feel." Easy drinking claret now and for 25+ years.
Oh yeah. Not everyone will like this style, although Parker evidently liked them, even though they were anti-Parkerized wines. Excellent-to-outstanding clarets, and when you factor in price, both were solidly "outstanding."

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 5:13 am
by DavidG
I've got a half case of the 2009. That's a lot for me. Still successfully resisting temptation on the 2010s.

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 1:05 pm
by JimHow
You need some 2010s David...
I could pick you up a few bottles at $42 next time I get to PJs, although I doubt I'll get there before the convention.
Your better bet might be to get a couple of these 2010 mags on sale at $85 each at Zachy's....

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 2:49 pm
by Jay Winton
DavidG wrote:I've got a half case of the 2009. That's a lot for me. Still successfully resisting temptation on the 2010s.
and I have half a case of the 2010...hmmm

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 3:02 pm
by Nicklasss
I've been a long time defender of Cantemerle, who did not sold his soul yet to concentration/oak/high scores. I think I had something to do with the 2005 being one of BWE wine of the year.

So I'll continue to influence our BD in the future...

Nic

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 3:08 pm
by JimHow
Indeed, Nic, and I look forward to your support of the 2002 vintage in a couple weeks.
BD

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 3:53 pm
by Chateau Vin
Earlier, fellow BWers' enablement made me get half a case each of 2009 regular bottles and 2010 splits. Last weekend, there was a sale with 15% off a our local chicago store. Couldn't resist half a case of 2010 regular bottles @$34 each...

Alongside, there was a lone bottle of 08 Poyfere@56. So grabbed that too...

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Fri Mar 14, 2014 4:04 pm
by JimHow
Wow that's a great deal CV.
Well done. Very well done indeed.

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:17 am
by brodway
Jim...
you never did report on the harmony between the Cantemerle and the whoopie pies

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 1:21 am
by JimHow
Words cannot express the glory, Emil, of a classic left banker matched with whoopie...

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 2:02 am
by Chateau Vin
What's the taste like of a whoopie? Sweet, sour, bland? Never had one...

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 2:09 am
by JimHow
Lol....
Did you hear that, gang?
CV has never had a whoopie pie.
It is the sweetness of the universe. The sweetness of life and all its beauty.
When one has matched the whoopie with a fine Medoc, well... Let me just say... One has attained a new consciousness. An altered state, a new state of being.
Again, mere words cannot describe....

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 2:20 am
by Nicklasss
Personnally, I like the Pie de la Whoopie on her own.

Great red wine are better with good company, than with Whoopie!

Nic

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 2:21 am
by JimHow
I think Nic was in an altered state one night in Napa in a room with a whoopie pie.
A new state of consciousness indeed....

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 2:23 am
by brodway
Now we know what Jim really does at work...


Pennsylvania, Maine, and New Hampshire all claim to be the birthplace of the Whoopie pie. In 2011, the Maine State Legislature considered naming the whoopie pie the official state pie. The proposal received bipartisan support. L.D. 71, officially known as "An Act to Designate the Whoopie Pie as the State Dessert", read "The whoopie pie, a baked good made of two chocolate cakes with a creamy frosting between them, is the official state dessert".[7] The Pennsylvania Dutch Convention & Visitors Bureau[8] and other observers in Lancaster County, PA, note that the whoopie pie comes from the area's Amish and Pennsylvania German culture – origins that are unlikely to leave an official paper trail – and has been handed down through generations. Most likely, Amish groups that migrated to Maine brought the treat to the people of Maine[citation needed]. Mainers assert that Labadie's in Lewiston, Maine has been making the confectionery since 1925.[10] The now-defunct Berwick Cake Company of Roxbury, Massachusetts had been making the "Whoopee Pie" since 1931 and it is also claimed that the whoopie pie originated there in Massachusetts and spread both north and south. It appears though that German immigrants brought the predecessor of the Whoopie Pie to communities throughout the northeast.

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 2:28 am
by JimHow
Emil, I determined that the origin of the whoopie pie is right here in the "Little Canada" section of Lewiston, at Labadie's Bakery on Lincoln Street.
That bakery has been in existence since 1925.
CV or anyone else, if you want to order some REAL whoopie pies through the mail, go here:

http://www.labadiesbakery.com/

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 2:40 am
by brodway
Jim captured at an afternoon meeting with the local grass roots representative lobbying for Maine's Act to Designate the Whoopie Pie as the State Dessert

http://danbyink.bangordailynews.com/201 ... festivals/

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 2:46 am
by JimHow
Now Moxie, well, I haven't even begun to go there yet with you guys.
There is only too much ecstasy that one can take in a lifetime.

We have a saying up here:

Maine: The Way Life Should Be.

https://www.google.com/search?q=maine+t ... B300%3B225

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Sat Mar 15, 2014 4:16 am
by Nicklasss
In two weeks, we'll have fun!

I can do something special, but no pants down (I never did that, but thank you Photoshop!) : i can be punk (Sid Vicious way) with a Whoopie pie and a glass of a nice red Bordeaux...

Can do anything for BWE glory...

Nic (30 minutes ago, I jumped into snow in T-shirt, with Marie-Claude as witness. Isn't that fun?)

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2014 4:24 pm
by Jay Winton
Jay Winton wrote:
DavidG wrote:I've got a half case of the 2009. That's a lot for me. Still successfully resisting temptation on the 2010s.
and I have half a case of the 2010...hmmm
and now 6 of the 2009 on pre arrival from Bassins-May. They have a bit more if anyone is interested. $42.99

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2014 5:11 pm
by JimHow
Saw that. They had it in stock recently for $39.
Sigh, the BWE impact is striking again.
Still, that's a good price for that wine.
Any idea when they are due to arrive?

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Thu Mar 20, 2014 6:24 pm
by Jay Winton
JimHow wrote:Saw that. They had it in stock recently for $39.
Sigh, the BWE impact is striking again.
Still, that's a good price for that wine.
Any idea when they are due to arrive?
late April, early May.

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Fri Mar 21, 2014 3:05 pm
by Jay Winton
Let me enable as I have been enabled before. Today (and every 21st of the month) free shipping in the US on a case or more from B-21 in Florida on all wines including 2010 Cantemerle for $44.99-not the best price in the USA but with free shipping about as cheap as I've seen it. If you are a first time customer, you can get an additional discount. I've bought from them before with no issues. They also have mags for $109-not sure if they ship free.

https://www.b-21.com/searchprods.asp

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2014 4:48 pm
by pomilion
Tried the 2010 the other day and was quite impressed, particularly for the price. Doubt this will ever completely shut down, and it should be drinking wonderfully by 6-8 years from now and maintain its form nicely for 20-25 years. Just cleaned out PJ's and look forward to enjoying this beauty over the years. Thanks for everyone's enablement...

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Wed Mar 26, 2014 4:51 pm
by JimHow
Well done, pomilion. Very well done indeed.

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2014 2:14 pm
by Nicklasss
A case of the 2010 is coming to my cellar as well.

I don't know why but the 2010 is 2$ cheaper than the 2008... The 2010 is 50$ here, not bad.

Nic

Re: 2009 vs. 2010 Cantemerle

Posted: Sun Apr 06, 2014 2:32 pm
by JimHow
Well done, Nic. Very nicely done indeed.