Taking a walk on the wild side with 2000 Cantermerle
Posted: Thu Aug 18, 2016 9:09 pm
With New Zealand rack of lamb, roast potatoes, green beans and designer (long and skinny) carrots.
Youthful maroon with no bricking. Pleasing ripe berry fruit on the nose. Developing some complexity with leather & bilberry/wild fruit notes. Savoury entry on the palate with a thrillingly grippy-ness and raspy tannins, now on the back foot, this has a (down to) earthiness and damp soil. It also has lavender, tobacco, pine needles and pine needle floor enleaving the Margaux berries. This has a powerful dense, intense and raspy mid-palate, which is rather invigorating, complementing the abundant ripe dark fruits.
Smooth is not an adjective that would not sit comfortably with this wine at its current juncture, it is still a bit of a rough diamond. However another five years could do it a lot of favours. It could tame its wild side and allow it to develop more complexity and mellow a bit. Great potential. Definitely accessible today, but the 1996 is more together right now. Both have scope to scale greater heights and neither can compete - yet - with the 1989, the Holy Grail of Cantermerle. I took delivery of three bottles of the Berlin Wall-down-vintage today. My guess is that the 2005 vintage has the best chance, among recent vintages, of emulating the Lafite-like greatness of the 1989.
Youthful maroon with no bricking. Pleasing ripe berry fruit on the nose. Developing some complexity with leather & bilberry/wild fruit notes. Savoury entry on the palate with a thrillingly grippy-ness and raspy tannins, now on the back foot, this has a (down to) earthiness and damp soil. It also has lavender, tobacco, pine needles and pine needle floor enleaving the Margaux berries. This has a powerful dense, intense and raspy mid-palate, which is rather invigorating, complementing the abundant ripe dark fruits.
Smooth is not an adjective that would not sit comfortably with this wine at its current juncture, it is still a bit of a rough diamond. However another five years could do it a lot of favours. It could tame its wild side and allow it to develop more complexity and mellow a bit. Great potential. Definitely accessible today, but the 1996 is more together right now. Both have scope to scale greater heights and neither can compete - yet - with the 1989, the Holy Grail of Cantermerle. I took delivery of three bottles of the Berlin Wall-down-vintage today. My guess is that the 2005 vintage has the best chance, among recent vintages, of emulating the Lafite-like greatness of the 1989.