NY Times article on Bordeaux

Post Reply
User avatar
AlexR
Posts: 2378
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 10:35 am
Contact:

NY Times article on Bordeaux

Post by AlexR »

Slightly snooty article on Bordeaux in the New York Times:

http://www.nytimes.com/2016/10/26/dinin ... .html?_r=0

Asimov talks about Bordeaux in the past tense and basically says it’s a wine for old farts. However, I think he only sees this from the narrow angle of his geeky microcosm and certainly does not have a good handle on what the world at large thinks of Bordeaux (China is by far the number one export market for both volume and value, Belgium imports more Bordeaux than the United States, etc.).

For all the article’s faults, he does get a few things right :-). Bordeaux shines at table i.e., it’s not your sipping wine at a party. That’s for sure. And it has structure, something so often missing in other wines…

Most of the wines the Times tasted were great growths, which perfectly illustrates the age-old problem when the name "Bordeaux" is mentioned. The great wines *have* become very expensive. But they are only the tip of the iceberg (approximately 5% of the total). He’s on target when he compares these wines to Premier Cru Burgundy or vintage Champagne.
Asimov pretty much rejects second wines out of hand (he at least admits he has little experience with them).

Yes, there is a lot of inferior cheap Bordeaux out there. BUT there are also plenty of good value wines.
Funny, isn’t it, how it’s considered really cool when someone tracks down a lovely minor Burgundy or a wine from a little-known French region like Bugey or Lubéron, but Bordeaux is considered old hat and not propitious to such discoveries. Nothing could be further from the truth!
Asimov writes that "perhaps the $ 20 range is not the best place to look for Bordeaux". I heartily disagree, even if I acknowledge that critics, the media, and the wine trade in some countries cannot be bothered to search out inexpensive wines that can hold their own in terms of value for money with ones from anywhere in the world. Their reasoning: even if I come across a really good wine from a modest appellation, I won’t have a market for it, and the wine will sit on the shelf. So why bother?

Obviously, the Bordelais have to take their fair share of blame for this situation.

Alex R.
User avatar
AKR
Posts: 5234
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 4:33 am
Contact:

Re: NY Times article on Bordeaux

Post by AKR »

I think Asimov feels the smaller wines simply aren't fashionable anymore.

And for the unknowledgeable consumer, that whole segment can be a minefield.

A US consumer can be pretty safe in selecting a Mondavi/Beringer/Beaulieu wine at the $20 price point, and having a good consistent experience 80% of the time.

They don't need to learn appellations, vineyards, grapes, vintages, etc.

I love the aforementioned wines too, and buy them in good vintages like 2001, 2007 (backfilled) or 2013.

To get the same results in Bordeaux, one has to be a more informed consumer.

Although with the string of great vintages, from 2000 onwards, its certainly easier than ever.

Global warming seems to me to have been very beneficial for these smaller properties, which may not have been in the ripest mesoclimates.
User avatar
DavidG
Posts: 8293
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:12 pm
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Re: NY Times article on Bordeaux

Post by DavidG »

AlexR wrote:Funny, isn’t it, how it’s considered really cool when someone tracks down a lovely minor Burgundy or a wine from a little-known French region like Bugey or Lubéron, but Bordeaux is considered old hat and not propitious to such discoveries. Nothing could be further from the truth!
That's why we have BWE!
User avatar
Comte Flaneur
Posts: 4887
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:05 pm
Contact:

Re: NY Times article on Bordeaux

Post by Comte Flaneur »

Lazy journalism from a lazy journalist.

'Er...what am I going to write about this week?...just a hackneyed article about Bordeaux spouting old shibboleths without bothering to do any proper research
User avatar
Rudi Finkler
Posts: 221
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 6:15 pm
Location: Saarland, Germany
Contact:

Re: NY Times article on Bordeaux

Post by Rudi Finkler »

Yes, this article is not worth mentioning...
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 266 guests