Brunello is back

Post Reply
User avatar
Comte Flaneur
Posts: 4887
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:05 pm
Contact:

Brunello is back

Post by Comte Flaneur »

I used to buy quite a lot of Brunello di Montalcino in the 1990s but gradually bought less and less as these wines underwhelmed me. The low water mark was a tasting of 2001s we did in CT seven or eight years ago. Many of these Brunellos were insipid, low in acidity/unbalanced, anodyne/anonymous/not recognisable as Brunello.

My attitude was why bother with Brunello when you could buy Rosso cheaper, and Rosso is more accessible and fun to drink than those lugubrious Brunellos.

But we are hearing better things especially from the 2010 vintage on, from people here and elsewhere. I just want to throw my hat in the ring too. Better late than never.

I recently bought a case of straight Altesino 2010 - what a marvellous wine it is with a lovely perfume and Brunello-ness.

Last week I went to a burgundy tasting - a U.K. Merchant specialising in Burgundy, California and a little bit of Italy.

The wine of the night was a 2012 Gorelli Il Potazzine Brunello. It really knocked my socks off, and is already drinking very well. It really is a cracking wine, and showed a clean pair of heels to some illustrious premier Cru burgundies and Roagna Barolo.

It is good to see these wines coming back to form. Until now virtually all my Italian purchases had been from Piedmont.
User avatar
dstgolf
Posts: 2088
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:00 am
Contact:

Re: Brunello is back

Post by dstgolf »

Ian

You have summed up my feelings about Brunello's in general to the tee. 1997/8 were supposed to be stellar years in the region and my buddy and I went deep buying about 20 cases of assorted producers each vintage with nothing rated under 94pts. They were disappointing virtually across the board and I found the 97s especially prematurely fell off the map. Super Tuscan's faired a little better but the Sassacaia, Gaia, Tignanello etc were very good but never really evolved into a better wine with age aka most new world wines. Today they are good but not worth the price.

PS Ian the 2001 Margaux is in this months Classics release locally for a mere $1230!!!!
Danny
User avatar
JimHow
Posts: 20211
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:49 pm
Location: Lewiston, Maine, United States
Contact:

Re: Brunello is back

Post by JimHow »

Il Poggione seems to be a wine that I like, I plan on buying a few on an annual basis.
User avatar
Nicklasss
Posts: 6422
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: Brunello is back

Post by Nicklasss »

Brunello good? Worth it price? Can age well? Give me a break.

Maybe I need to try some recent examples?

Nic

P.S. Danny, get the 2001 at the SAQ, and you'll save a bit, "only" 1158 $!
Last edited by Nicklasss on Mon Oct 23, 2017 10:26 am, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
Blanquito
Posts: 5923
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: Brunello is back

Post by Blanquito »

In my experience, Brunello is all over the map in quality, style, ageability, but the good stuff is really terrific.
User avatar
stefan
Posts: 6242
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: College Station, TX
Contact:

Re: Brunello is back

Post by stefan »

But 2010 Brunello, Patrick, is good across the board even if the style varies a lot.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 57 guests