2003 Sociando

Post Reply
User avatar
William P
Posts: 1210
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:43 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

2003 Sociando

Post by William P »

I had the 2003 Sociando the other night and thought I'd report. As you may recall, I recoiled at the 2001 SM as being overwhelmingly green. I'm happy to report that the 2003 SM does not have that problem. It was a rich Bordeaux with blackberry and ripe pit fruit flavors. Medium plus body without being over the top. I enjoyed it. I admit this was more Napa style than Bordeaux, so the purist beware. The tannins are resolved and there is, as of yet, no tertiary flavors developing. For me, this bottle was ready to drink.

I do want to confirm what Nic said about the 2003 LB, the Sociando is also very low in acid. This wine would be so much more enjoyable if there was a little more acidity to lift the ripeness of the fruit. If I were to grade this I'd say 90/91, an enjoyable wine if a bit atypical. A pretty face but without much intellect.

Bill
Last edited by William P on Tue Jun 26, 2018 3:31 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
JimHow
Posts: 20212
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:49 pm
Location: Lewiston, Maine, United States
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by JimHow »

Thanks for the update Bill. I have 10 bottles left, my plan is to drink one per year over the next 10 years.
User avatar
AKR
Posts: 5234
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 4:33 am
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by AKR »

I love the 2003. Maybe it will end up better than 1990.
User avatar
JimHow
Posts: 20212
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:49 pm
Location: Lewiston, Maine, United States
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by JimHow »

Sipping on the 2003 tonight after yelling at three DAs today.
It's really nice, IMHO.
What is striking me is how relatively young it remains.
User avatar
dstgolf
Posts: 2088
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:00 am
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by dstgolf »

Great to see another ugly duckling coming into its own.
Danny
User avatar
Blanquito
Posts: 5923
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by Blanquito »

AKR wrote:I love the 2003. Maybe it will end up better than 1990.
I’m a big fan of the 03 too, but the 90 is a very high bar. Here’s hoping!
User avatar
dstgolf
Posts: 2088
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 12:00 am
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by dstgolf »

The 03 again gone from my cellar too young but agree that unlike many/most SMs the cab was ripe and was void of green pepper notes which I don't hate anymore but prefer it to be absent. I think this will likely be right along the 90 if not surpass it. The experts were wrong with this one too.
Danny
User avatar
AKR
Posts: 5234
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 4:33 am
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by AKR »

Not sure what the exact scores were....but RMP was very positive on 03 S-M from the barrel all the way to various tastings in the bottle. 2003 gets some brickbats, but that clay area in the St Estephe (and surrounding areas) did really well.

I don't like green bell peppers either.
User avatar
johnz
Posts: 135
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 10:37 pm
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by johnz »

Easily the best Sociando I've had is the 1982 (even over the 1990). And well kept bottles are still young!

--Gary Rust
User avatar
William P
Posts: 1210
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:43 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by William P »

johnz wrote:Easily the best Sociando I've had is the 1982 (even over the 1990). And well kept bottles are still young!
I agree Gary, but as some of you know, I have a soft spot in my heart for the 82 vintage.

Bill
User avatar
William P
Posts: 1210
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:43 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by William P »

JimHow wrote:Sipping on the 2003 tonight after yelling at three DAs today.
It's really nice, IMHO.
What is striking me is how relatively young it remains.

Totally agree, the fruit was fresh with no trapping of age other than the tannins have moderated. Glad you enjoyed it.

Bill
User avatar
Blanquito
Posts: 5923
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by Blanquito »

I agree, when “on” the 82 is far and away my favorite vintage of Sociando but I’ve had quite a few off bottles along the way.
User avatar
JimHow
Posts: 20212
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:49 pm
Location: Lewiston, Maine, United States
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by JimHow »

I think when "on" 1982 is my favorite vintage, period.
User avatar
Blanquito
Posts: 5923
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by Blanquito »

JimHow wrote:I think when "on" 1982 is my favorite vintage, period.
Word.
User avatar
robert goulet
Posts: 1268
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 8:18 am
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by robert goulet »

Hmmmm...Never found my '03 psuedo-napa in any way shape or form.


For me, Sociando tastes like it has a nice dollop of cab franc in it....yet it's percentage is very small.
I call Sociando the Bordeaux for cab franc lovers because tasting Sociando blind transports me to the loire valley.
User avatar
JimHow
Posts: 20212
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:49 pm
Location: Lewiston, Maine, United States
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by JimHow »

Sociando Mallet is one of the great wines of BWE.
User avatar
William P
Posts: 1210
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:43 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by William P »

"Hmmmm...Never found my '03 psuedo-napa in any way shape or form. "

And SM never transports me to the Loire Valley. Reasonable palates can disagree it appears.

Bill
User avatar
robert goulet
Posts: 1268
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 8:18 am
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by robert goulet »

William P wrote:"Hmmmm...Never found my '03 psuedo-napa in any way shape or form. "

And SM never transports me to the Loire Valley. Reasonable palates can disagree it appears.

Bill

Agreed brother...it would be boring as fuq if everyone agreed
User avatar
AKR
Posts: 5234
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 4:33 am
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by AKR »

some years of SM do have greenness, although i'm not sure how well they might map on to Loire reds since that's a whole category I simply stay far away from, having been grossed out by chinon, bourgeiul in my youth.
User avatar
robert goulet
Posts: 1268
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 8:18 am
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by robert goulet »

Chinon is heaven
User avatar
AKR
Posts: 5234
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 4:33 am
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by AKR »

I had a 2003 Sociando Mallet last night, double decanted + lightly chilled, with seared flap meat, a cold beet salad, tater tots and broccoli with gorgonzola crumbles. The wine was fantastic as was dinner (both in taste and visual appeal). This is such a complete wine, a little tannin and depth to go with a fatty/bloody piece of beef, and so much fruit.

I have not had any younger S-M's, lets say post 2005 or so, but this is my favorite vintage in between 75 and 05. Even more than 90. Solid A wine. They just hit out of the park.
User avatar
JimHow
Posts: 20212
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:49 pm
Location: Lewiston, Maine, United States
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by JimHow »

Yep.
User avatar
Blanquito
Posts: 5923
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by Blanquito »

Still have 21 bottles of this!
User avatar
Comte Flaneur
Posts: 4887
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:05 pm
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by Comte Flaneur »

I just opened a 1996, first bottle of my second case.
User avatar
Blanquito
Posts: 5923
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by Blanquito »

Comte Flaneur wrote:I just opened a 1996, first bottle of my second case.
I think the 96 is in a great place. The 95 also. Wish I could find more at <$60.
User avatar
Chateau Vin
Posts: 1522
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 3:55 pm
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by Chateau Vin »

Comte Flaneur wrote:I just opened a 1996, first bottle of my second case.
I have 3 bottles of 96 version left, and curious to know how it’s faring now...
User avatar
Comte Flaneur
Posts: 4887
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:05 pm
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by Comte Flaneur »

CV

I must admit I never really ‘got’ this wine. This bottle still has a remarkably youthful hue, but definitely more promising than previous encounters the last of which was a few years ago. Like Patrick with his 2003s I have this case and another to go, bought on the strength of Michel Bettane proclaiming In 1997 that this was one of the top three wines of the 1996 vintage, I kid you not. I think the other two were Latour and Lafite so at £160 a case it seemed like a good bet.

I will report back.
User avatar
Chateau Vin
Posts: 1522
Joined: Thu Oct 20, 2011 3:55 pm
Contact:

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by Chateau Vin »

Comte Flaneur wrote:CV

I must admit I never really ‘got’ this wine. This bottle still has a remarkably youthful hue, but definitely more promising than previous encounters the last of which was a few years ago. Like Patrick with his 2003s I have this case and another to go, bought on the strength of Michel Bettane proclaiming In 1997 that this was one of the top three wines of the 1996 vintage, I kid you not. I think the other two were Latour and Lafite so at £160 a case it seemed like a good bet.

I will report back.
It’s a bit of relief to know that someone else also is in the same boat as I am. I had this maybe couple of years ago, and I also didn’t ‘get’ it. I thought maybe I am an outlier to not get it, or maybe the bottle I opened. That’s why I asked ‘how it’s faring now’.
User avatar
Blanquito
Posts: 5923
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: 2003 Sociando

Post by Blanquito »

Cracked an 03 Sociando tonight:
Nice cabernet nose of mint, cassis, cedar. Pleasant attack of grapey and sweet-tart fruits, integrated structure with a rounded mouthfeel, good finish with a bit of tannic grip. In a nice place, not green at all by my standards. Nice sweetness and glycerin on the palate with enough brightness. Deepens with some air, but almost a pretty wine by the norms of this chateau. Good and ready in a mid-maturity stage. 90-91 pts.
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 158 guests