TN: DP, DPR, DPO, DPP2

Post Reply
User avatar
sdr
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:20 pm
Contact:

TN: DP, DPR, DPO, DPP2

Post by sdr »

DP, DPR, DPO, DPP2 - Ft. Lauderdale, Florida (1/7/2020)

It was my biennual time to present a wine theme to the local wine group so I decided to do a champagne theme with Dom Pérignon. There are now a few different types of Dom Pérignon since along with the standard white (now called P1) and Rosé, there are two late disgorged versions of each, termed P2 (at about age 18) and ultra rare P3 (at about age 30). I was able to source some of each except for P3. I hoped to discover both how well Dom Pérignon ages and if I could determine a consistent house style.
  • 2008 Dom Pérignon Champagne Legacy Edition Label - France, Champagne
    Very pale, very delicate, very beautiful. Lilac aroma. No toast, no yeast, just crystalline expression of flowers. Beautiful balance, not too acidic and already a treat to drink. (93 pts.)
  • 2004 Dom Pérignon Champagne - France, Champagne
    Considerably more developed than the ‘08 in a positive direction. Fuller, deeper even if still very youthful. Possibly not quite a nuanced as the younger sibling. Charming and delightful. Drink this before the ‘08 and let the infant sleep if you can. (93 pts.)
  • 2002 Dom Pérignon Champagne Andy Warhol Label - France, Champagne
    Seems somehow even younger than the ‘04. Very shy and citric but not too acidic. Hasn’t budged since release. Nice though, and poised for the distant future. (92 pts.)
  • 2002 Dom Pérignon Champagne P2 - France, Champagne
    Much more approachable than the P1. Fuller and richer but not by much but it’s therefore easier to drink it now. It too should develop well in the next decade or two. (93 pts.)
  • 1996 Moët & Chandon Champagne Cuvée Dom Pérignon - France, Champagne
    Only Dom Pérignon can taste so young at almost a quarter of a century. There’s some evidence of maturity yet it’s still delicate and citric. A very fine Dom Pérignon to drink now but no rush at all. While some of the 1996 champagnes are become erratic the Dom Pérignon has been very consistent since release. (92 pts.)
  • 1996 Dom Pérignon Champagne Oenothèque - France, Champagne
    The first Dom Pérignon in the series to display a bit of toast and it adds welcome complexity. The extra aging on the lees gives the Oenotheque more depth and more flavor. Really excellent for drinking now since it has the vivacity of youth and a hint of age. (93 pts.)
  • 1996 Moët & Chandon Champagne Cuvée Dom Pérignon Rosé - France, Champagne
    Delightful Rosé. Despite a puzzling lack of fragrance there’s plenty of rosé character on the palate to distinguish it from the white version. Which you prefer is just a matter of taste. (93 pts.)
  • 1996 Dom Pérignon Champagne Rosé P2 - France, Champagne
    Beautiful again and a noticeable if small step up from the P1. More of everything - red fruit, concentration, sucrosité. Gentle and elegant, decent mousse. (94 pts.)
  • 1995 Moët & Chandon Champagne Cuvée Dom Pérignon - France, Champagne
    The group seems to have picked this as their favorite Dom Pérignon of the tasting but I was not quite as impressed. Nevertheless it’s very fine and beautifully balanced. A bit of age shows yet it’s fresh and energetic. The years have tamed the bubbles some but they are tiny and plentiful. Even if you prefer your champagne young you can enjoy this middle aged version. (93 pts.)
  • 1990 Moët & Chandon Champagne Cuvée Dom Pérignon - France, Champagne
    Finally a Dom Pérignon which is fully mature without a doubt. I have found the ‘90 perhaps the most inconsistent vintage for the usually reliable Dom Pérignon but we were blessed with a perfect specimen. No longer pale, there’s a nice tawny shade and plenty of bubbles. More intricate than any of the younger vintages, both delicious and challenging to the intellect. Deeply satisfying for my palate. What Dom Pérignon at its apogee is all about. (94 pts.)
  • 1982 Moët & Chandon Champagne Cuvée Dom Pérignon - France, Champagne
    Now the color is definitely gold and the stream is modest although appropriate for age. Slightly oxidative and it’s beginning to fatigue. Maybe partly due to the very prolific vintage there’s more age showing than brightness. But by no means undrinkable. (91 pts.)
  • 1975 Moët & Chandon Champagne Cuvée Dom Pérignon - France, Champagne
    While the group picked this one as their favorite of the ancient vintages I was less enamored. Full of interest and definitely alive, the fairly active mousse is proof that it had been well stored before I acquired it about a decade ago. Too much burnt popcorn on the nose for me to get past even though the savory flavor did not display it. (91 pts.)
  • 1973 Moët & Chandon Champagne Cuvée Dom Pérignon - France, Champagne
    The least successful vintage of the vertical even granting dispensation for old age. There are definite sherry notes which some tasters might appreciate more than me. It’s not dead though and a small sip expands your perception of very aged champagne. (88 pts.)
  • 1966 Moët & Chandon Champagne Cuvée Dom Pérignon - France, Champagne
    If you think that champagne from the decade of the seventies is just too decrepit for anyone to like, you need to try this 1966 from the prior decade. Even though the ‘66 Dom Pérignon is now so old it’s beyond the usual experience of champagne even though there are still a surprising number of tiny bubbles to prickle the tongue. The dark gold color does not inspire confidence. But amazingly there’s no oxidation, no sherry, no mud. What is in there is what I’m told is a classical note in old Dom - expresso. Also some beef and smoke. Masculine as opposed to the filigree profile of young Dom Pérignon. Decadent. Truly fascinating and it lasted well in the glass other than quickly donating its carbon dioxide to the atmosphere. (94 pts.)
  • 1983 Château Climens - France, Bordeaux, Sauternais, Barsac
    Another fabulous ‘73 Climens. Gorgeous peachy fruit unique to Climens, medium weight, elegant and not too heavy, tropical or sweet. Perfect state of maturity. The botrytis has been absorbed by the fruit. (95 pts.)
I seriously doubt there is any champagne that stays so youthful as long as Dom Pérignon. It seems to take a quarter century or so to blossom but then advance fairly quickly after that. But since I could not possibly buy the oldest ones on release even though I have been collecting them for years, storage conditions may have played a role. Yet the oldest of all, the 1966, showed that I had not yet reached the age where Dom Pérignon is unlikely to give pleasure. I don’t think the Rosé will age quite as well as the white, yet last year I tasted the 1985 DPR and it was amazingly fresh and lively, so who knows?

Stu
Last edited by sdr on Fri Jan 24, 2020 3:00 pm, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
JCNorthway
Posts: 1551
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:31 pm
Contact:

Re: TN: DP, DPR, DPO, DPP2

Post by JCNorthway »

All I can say is, "Wow!" What an amazing lineup of Champagne. It sounds like a once in a lifetime (at most) experience. And it is very impressive how the older vintages (mostly) are still going strong.Thanks for sharing your notes.
User avatar
JimHow
Posts: 20212
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:49 pm
Location: Lewiston, Maine, United States
Contact:

Re: TN: DP, DPR, DPO, DPP2

Post by JimHow »

Wow. The 1996 Dom Perignon that Winona brought to my house a couple summers ago was one of my greatest Champagne thrills.
Seemed a point at that time.
User avatar
Blanquito
Posts: 5923
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: TN: DP, DPR, DPO, DPP2

Post by Blanquito »

JimHow wrote:Wow. The 1996 Dom Perignon that Winona brought to my house a couple summers ago was one of my greatest Champagne thrills.
Seemed a point at that time.
Indeed, two of the three times I've had the 96 Dom in the last 5 years, it was "one of my greatest Champagne thrills" too. The last of the 3 bottles (all from the same source) was the least evolved, interestingly-- it was still excellent but seemed coiled and holding back some of its brilliance, like Stu's bottle here sounds.

At any rate, these other vintages must have been wonderful to out-do the 96!
User avatar
stefan
Posts: 6242
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:08 pm
Location: College Station, TX
Contact:

Re: TN: DP, DPR, DPO, DPP2

Post by stefan »

Great report, Stuart.

Yeah, 1996 Dom is great. I agree with Stuart that Dom ages better than any other Champagne.
User avatar
DavidG
Posts: 8293
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:12 pm
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Re: TN: DP, DPR, DPO, DPP2

Post by DavidG »

Another fantastic report, Stu. Sounds like I finished my 1996 Dom too soon, but I did love them all. Now I just have to keep my hands off of the 2002 and 2008.

My only experience with a late-disgorged Dom (Oenotheque, P2, P3) was the 1993 Oenotheque back in 2014. It was fabulous.
User avatar
Blanquito
Posts: 5923
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: TN: DP, DPR, DPO, DPP2

Post by Blanquito »

I know grower fizz is all the shizzle. I like many of these, but I am a not ashamed to declare my love for the big houses like Dom Perignon. Not at all. I really only drink grower champagne because it’s so much better QPR usually.
User avatar
sdr
Posts: 541
Joined: Thu Jan 29, 2009 8:20 pm
Contact:

Re: TN: DP, DPR, DPO, DPP2

Post by sdr »

Blanquito wrote:I know grower fizz is all the shizzle. I like many of these, but I am a not ashamed to declare my love for the big houses like Dom Perignon. Not at all. I really only drink grower champagne because it’s so much better QPR usually.
I’m with you, brother Blanquito. When they are on form, it’s hard to beat the likes of Dom, Krug, Bollinger, Pol Roger and the like. Of the growers, I do like Pierre Moncuit, Pierre Peters, Tarlant and Vilmart. I found the Grande Marques more consistent though and unless you are hunting Tête de Cuvée, not necessarily more expensive.

Stu
User avatar
Nicklasss
Posts: 6424
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: TN: DP, DPR, DPO, DPP2

Post by Nicklasss »

Very wide Dom Perignon line up. Impressive and very interesting note Stuart.

I'm impressed how DP can age, from that tasting. And knowing you're a tough grader, I feel like you can't be wrong with Moët et Chandon top cuvée.

Except the 2009, I likes all DP I had. But all young ones like 1995, 1996, 1998, 2003, 2004, 2008.

Vive le Dom Pérignon!

Nic
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 187 guests