A hard, thin, lifeless 2002 Palmer.

Post Reply
User avatar
JimHow
Posts: 20211
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:49 pm
Location: Lewiston, Maine, United States
Contact:

A hard, thin, lifeless 2002 Palmer.

Post by JimHow »

After pretty much fasting from alcohol for the past month other than a little wine at a couple dinners in Fairbanks, I decided to uncork what I thought would be something good upon my return to Maine yesterday, a 2002 Palmer. It didn't seem to be corked, but it was pretty hard to drink. Lifeless, hard, thin, like chewing on nails. Tannic and acerbic. Maybe it was damaged, I don't know, but it offered very little pleasure. 85 points.
User avatar
Gerry M.
Posts: 851
Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 2:51 am
Location: Tyngsboro, MA
Contact:

Re: A hard, thin, lifeless 2002 Palmer.

Post by Gerry M. »

That's sad to hear. Palmer is one of my favorites but the prices have really soared.over the last few years. I've been sparingly opening them on special occasions knowing I probably not be buying again. I do still have some 70', 83', 89' and 00'. The 70' I think I'll have to drink up soon though and your note is prodding my to do it.

I've never had the 02' but, while not expecting a blockbuster, I would think it's a solid wine. The CT notes are all over the place but tend to indicate it's at a "drink now" point. Maybe put aside and try next day?
User avatar
JimHow
Posts: 20211
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:49 pm
Location: Lewiston, Maine, United States
Contact:

Re: A hard, thin, lifeless 2002 Palmer.

Post by JimHow »

Yeah, a disappointment Gerry, it may have been damaged, I don't know.
User avatar
marcs
Posts: 1860
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 2:51 am
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Re: A hard, thin, lifeless 2002 Palmer.

Post by marcs »

Was this from the MacArthur's score way back when (the weekend I first met a lot of you guys!)? I bought a number of bottles of Palmer and after trying one I sold most of the rest (I still have one left). I didn't find it quite as bad as you seem to but it wasn't good. Palmer is a plush, merlot-dependent wine and 2002 was not a good year for that approach.
User avatar
JimHow
Posts: 20211
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:49 pm
Location: Lewiston, Maine, United States
Contact:

Re: A hard, thin, lifeless 2002 Palmer.

Post by JimHow »

I don’t think it was from the MacArthurs heist, it could have been, but I think I’ve had that lone bottle in my cellar for quite a while.
User avatar
AKR
Posts: 5234
Joined: Thu Mar 19, 2015 4:33 am
Contact:

Re: A hard, thin, lifeless 2002 Palmer.

Post by AKR »

Ugh that hurts to hear.
User avatar
marcs
Posts: 1860
Joined: Fri Nov 05, 2010 2:51 am
Location: Washington DC
Contact:

Re: A hard, thin, lifeless 2002 Palmer.

Post by marcs »

I wouldn't infer from this to other vintages of Palmer. Like I said, 2002 was a particularly bad year for their approach.
User avatar
Nicklasss
Posts: 6422
Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2009 5:25 pm
Contact:

Re: A hard, thin, lifeless 2002 Palmer.

Post by Nicklasss »

The worst that can happens to a BWEers, is a 2002 Palmer like you had Jim. But i agree, probably a defective bottle as I can't imagine Palmer not performing well in any vintage.

You probably would have been better with a decent bottle of 2002 GPL.

Nic
User avatar
Claudius2
Posts: 1746
Joined: Tue Jun 22, 2010 9:07 am
Location: Singapore
Contact:

Re: A hard, thin, lifeless 2002 Palmer.

Post by Claudius2 »

Guys
Out of curiosity I checked the notes on Cellartracker and the average rating based on 94 notes was 91.6 and the descriptions of the wine were neatly always positive. Comments seemed to be similar to many other Palmer vintages and some comments were glowingly good.
So that bottle sounds like it is atypical.
User avatar
JimHow
Posts: 20211
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:49 pm
Location: Lewiston, Maine, United States
Contact:

Re: A hard, thin, lifeless 2002 Palmer.

Post by JimHow »

Yeah, the more I think about it, the more I think it was damaged, Claudius.
User avatar
jckba
Posts: 1828
Joined: Wed Apr 24, 2013 9:18 pm
Location: Sparkill, NY
Contact:

Re: A hard, thin, lifeless 2002 Palmer.

Post by jckba »

A couple of years ago, Jim (aka Bordeauxnut) brought a 2002 Palmer to a wine dinner of mine and while it was drinkable, it did not possess any of the Palmer charm one would come to expect.
User avatar
robert goulet
Posts: 1268
Joined: Fri Mar 13, 2009 8:18 am
Contact:

Re: A hard, thin, lifeless 2002 Palmer.

Post by robert goulet »

I had the 2002 alter ego a few years after release...it's was a very pretty and charming wine....had another bottle 8yrs later and the fruit had faded leaving oak as the prevalent denominator, a disappointing experience.
User avatar
Comte Flaneur
Posts: 4887
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:05 pm
Contact:

Re: A hard, thin, lifeless 2002 Palmer.

Post by Comte Flaneur »

My guess it needs one or two more Blanquitos. I have a lone bottle which I am waiting on. Jim’s was the first bad experience I had read about with this wine.
User avatar
JimHow
Posts: 20211
Joined: Thu Nov 20, 2008 10:49 pm
Location: Lewiston, Maine, United States
Contact:

Re: A hard, thin, lifeless 2002 Palmer.

Post by JimHow »

Yeah, agreed, I'm really thinking it was damaged somehow, although I don't think it was corked.
It just never opened up, it was painful to drink.
User avatar
DavidG
Posts: 8293
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:12 pm
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Re: A hard, thin, lifeless 2002 Palmer.

Post by DavidG »

Ian’s Blanquito comment reminds me of the shopkeeper in the Monty Python dead parrot sketch: “Its not dead, it’s just sleeping." Ian, I hope your bottle fares better than the parrot.
User avatar
Blanquito
Posts: 5923
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:24 pm

Re: A hard, thin, lifeless 2002 Palmer.

Post by Blanquito »

Thread drift, but is the 2019 Palmer at ~$200 a must-buy, never-to-be-seen-again futures pricing for this chateau? Like everything else these days, the critics are quite high on 2019 in general and Palmer specifically, but I haven’t really paid attention to the vintage’s style and quality.
User avatar
DavidG
Posts: 8293
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2008 1:12 pm
Location: Maryland
Contact:

Re: A hard, thin, lifeless 2002 Palmer.

Post by DavidG »

I bought some 2019 Palmer at that price. Haven’t tasted it but it did get a lot of "must ave" recommendations. That said, if $200 turns into $250 landed due to tariffs, I may bail.
User avatar
Comte Flaneur
Posts: 4887
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:05 pm
Contact:

Re: A hard, thin, lifeless 2002 Palmer.

Post by Comte Flaneur »

Yes I hope the parrot is still alive David.

Ch. Palmer 2019 was released at £999/6 in bond, a bargain by Palmer standards. I didn’t bit but I know people who did including Mark in this forum.
User avatar
William P
Posts: 1210
Joined: Mon Jan 26, 2009 9:43 pm
Location: Sacramento, CA
Contact:

Re: A hard, thin, lifeless 2002 Palmer.

Post by William P »

DavidG wrote: Sun Feb 21, 2021 8:08 pm Ian’s Blanquito comment reminds me of the shopkeeper in the Monty Python dead parrot sketch: “Its not dead, it’s just sleeping." Ian, I hope your bottle fares better than the parrot.
I believe the next line was, "It was dead when you nailed him to the perch".
Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 162 guests